Artículo wiki · Colección 03
Conductores de Cobre vs Aluminio
Referencia técnica sobre Conductores de Cobre vs Aluminio para el diseño, integración e implementación de sistemas de energía inalámbrica.
Copper dominates WPT windings for its conductivity and mature Litz supply chain. Aluminum appears where mass reduction matters — airborne or mobile robot payloads — at the cost of larger cross-section for same Rdc and more careful termination against galvanic corrosion and creep.
At AC frequencies, material choice still follows skin and proximity rules; aluminum's lower conductivity means either thicker sections or accepting higher loss for the same geometry.
01Copper advantages
- Higher conductivity — smaller coil for same loss.
- Reliable solder, weld, and crimp terminations.
- Wide Litz and foil vendor base.
02Aluminum considerations
Use plated pads, ultrasonic weld, or mechanical clamps rated for thermal cycle. Avoid direct copper-aluminum contact without isolation in wet environments. Verify Rac on prototype — some aluminum foil designs win on weight but need larger area changing k.
03Decision frame
- Default copper unless mass budget forces aluminum.
- Re-run thermal and k models on any material swap.
- Fleet maintenance training for aluminum termination inspection differs from copper.
