SiCore Dynamics

Wiki article · Collection 01

Static vs Dynamic Charging

Engineering reference on Static vs Dynamic Charging for wireless power system design, integration, and deployment.

6 minArticle 11/16Fundamentals
Static vs Dynamic Charging — educational diagram
Fig.: Educational diagram for “Static vs Dynamic Charging”.

Static wireless charging transfers power while the vehicle is stopped on a pad or dock. Dynamic (in-motion) charging transfers power while the vehicle moves over a powered track or segmented coil array embedded in a path.

01Static (opportunity) charging

  • Fits AGV/AMR dwell points, shift breaks, and process waits.
  • Simpler magnetics and control than continuous roadway arrays.
  • Easier safety zoning: charge only when docked and authenticated.
  • Most common industrial deployment model today.
Static vs Dynamic Charging — supporting diagram
Fig.: Supporting illustration for “Static vs Dynamic Charging”.

02Dynamic charging

  • Can shrink onboard battery size if the route is powered.
  • Requires infrastructure along the path — cost and civil works rise quickly.
  • Segmentation, handoff between coils, and EMI along the route are hard problems.
  • More common in research, transit pilots, and specialized corridors than general warehouses.

03Fleet design note

Many successful robot fleets combine a modest battery with frequent static opportunity charges. That often beats a huge battery or a fully electrified floor. Dynamic charging becomes interesting when stops are rare and routes are fixed enough to justify embedded infrastructure.